Lore Peter Sandoz v. Consolidated Textile Corporation, Debtor-Appellee
This text of 186 F.2d 309 (Lore Peter Sandoz v. Consolidated Textile Corporation, Debtor-Appellee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
186 F.2d 309
Lore Peter SANDOZ, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
CONSOLIDATED TEXTILE CORPORATION, Debtor-Appellee.
No. 103, Docket 21814.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Jan. 9, 1951.
Decided Jan. 24, 1951.
Brock & Sulzberger, New York City, Arnold J. Brock, Seymour S. Epstein, New York City, of counsel, for petitioner.
S. S. Jennings, Jr., (of Mudge, Stern, Williams & Tucker), New York City, J. B. Breckenridge, New York City, of counsel, for appellee Consolidated Textile Co., Inc.
Before CHASE, CLARK, and FRANK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The order of the District Court denying appellant's petition to reopen the reorganization proceedings of the debtor is affirmed. Willis v. Consolidated Textile Co., Inc., 2 Cir., 178 F.2d 924; Monhonk Realty Corporation v. Wise Shoe Stores, 2 Cir., 111 F.2d 287, certiorari denied 311 U.S. 654, 61 S.Ct. 47, 85 L.Ed. 418; Duebler v. Sherneth Corporation, 1 Cir., 160 F.2d 472.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 F.2d 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lore-peter-sandoz-v-consolidated-textile-corporati-ca2-1951.