Lore Peter Sandoz v. Consolidated Textile Corporation, Debtor-Appellee

186 F.2d 309
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 24, 1951·No. 21814·Published

Opinion

186 F.2d 309

Lore Peter SANDOZ, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
CONSOLIDATED TEXTILE CORPORATION, Debtor-Appellee.

No. 103, Docket 21814.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Jan. 9, 1951.
Decided Jan. 24, 1951.

Brock & Sulzberger, New York City, Arnold J. Brock, Seymour S. Epstein, New York City, of counsel, for petitioner.

S. S. Jennings, Jr., (of Mudge, Stern, Williams & Tucker), New York City, J. B. Breckenridge, New York City, of counsel, for appellee Consolidated Textile Co., Inc.

Before CHASE, CLARK, and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The order of the District Court denying appellant's petition to reopen the reorganization proceedings of the debtor is affirmed. Willis v. Consolidated Textile Co., Inc., 2 Cir., 178 F.2d 924; Monhonk Realty Corporation v. Wise Shoe Stores, 2 Cir., 111 F.2d 287, certiorari denied 311 U.S. 654, 61 S.Ct. 47, 85 L.Ed. 418; Duebler v. Sherneth Corporation, 1 Cir., 160 F.2d 472.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lore Peter Sandoz v. Consolidated Textile Corporation, Debtor-Appellee, 186 F.2d 309 (2d Cir. 1951).

186 F.2d 309 (Lore Peter Sandoz v. Consolidated Textile Corporation, Debtor-Appellee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mohonk Realty Corporation v. Wise Shoe Stores
111 F.2d 287 (Second Circuit, 1940)
Duebler v. Sherneth Corp.
160 F.2d 472 (Second Circuit, 1947)
Kimmich v. New York Clearing House Ass'n
311 U.S. 653 (Supreme Court, 1940)