Kimmich v. New York Clearing House Ass'n
311 U.S. 653, 61 S. Ct. 47, 85 L. Ed. 418, 1940 U.S. LEXIS 353
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 14, 1940
DocketNo. 342
StatusPublished
Cited by47 cases
This text of 311 U.S. 653 (Kimmich v. New York Clearing House Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kimmich v. New York Clearing House Ass'n, 311 U.S. 653, 61 S. Ct. 47, 85 L. Ed. 418, 1940 U.S. LEXIS 353 (1940).
Opinion
The motion to [654]*654proceed' on typewritten papers is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is ’denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Baum
32 F. Supp. 2d 642 (S.D. New York, 1999)
Public Service Co. of New Hampshire v. New Hampshire Electric Cooperative, Inc. (In re Public Service Co. of New Hampshire)
884 F.2d 11 (First Circuit, 1989)
In Re Public Service Company Of New Hampshire
884 F.2d 11 (First Circuit, 1989)
In Re O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc.
79 B.R. 161 (S.D. New York, 1987)
Matter of Carter
38 B.R. 636 (D. Connecticut, 1984)
In re Longhorn Securities Litigation
573 F. Supp. 255 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1983)
Hall v. Perry
703 F.2d 1339 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)
In Re Cochise College Park, Inc.
703 F.2d 1339 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)
In Re Morgan & Morgan, Inc.
24 B.R. 518 (S.D. New York, 1982)
Home Box Office, Inc. v. Advanced Consumer Technology, Movie Antenna, Inc.
549 F. Supp. 14 (S.D. New York, 1981)
Gulf Petroleum, S. A. v. Marrero (In Re Marrero)
7 B.R. 586 (D. Puerto Rico, 1980)
Federal's, Inc. v. Edmonton Investment Co.
555 F.2d 577 (Sixth Circuit, 1977)
Imperial Supply Co., Inc. v. Northern Ohio Bank
430 F. Supp. 339 (N.D. Ohio, 1976)
Fred H. Harmsen, and v. C. Arnholt Smith, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver of United States National Bank, in Intervention and v. C. Arnholt Smith, And
542 F.2d 496 (Ninth Circuit, 1976)
Harmsen v. Smith
542 F.2d 496 (Ninth Circuit, 1976)
Federal's, Inc. v. Edmonton Investment Company
404 F. Supp. 68 (E.D. Michigan, 1975)
In the Matter of Intaco Puerto Rico, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of Gabriel Alvarez & Associates
494 F.2d 94 (First Circuit, 1974)
United States v. Frank John Bonanno
487 F.2d 654 (Second Circuit, 1973)
United States v. Jose Francisco San Martin
469 F.2d 5 (Second Circuit, 1972)
In re Proceedings Against Suffolk County District Court Judge Floyd Sarisohn
233 N.E.2d 276 (New York Court of Appeals, 1967)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
311 U.S. 653, 61 S. Ct. 47, 85 L. Ed. 418, 1940 U.S. LEXIS 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimmich-v-new-york-clearing-house-assn-scotus-1940.