Lordi v. People's Surety Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Lordi v. People's Surety Co.

119 N.Y.S. 1133

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lordi v. People's Surety Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 69 Misc. 598 →

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 22, 1909·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is controlled by Musco v. United Surety Company, 132 App. Div. 300, 117 N. Y. Supp. 21. Defendant concedes that judgment should be affirmed, in view of the case cited, which has been affirmed by the Court of Appeals on the question of the constitutionality of the act. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, with leave to the defendant to answer within six days upon payment of costs in this court and in the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case is controlled by Musco v. United Surety Company, 132 App. Div. 300, 117 N. Y. Supp. 21. Defendant concedes that judgment should be affirmed, in view of the case cited, which has been affirmed by the Court of Appeals on the question of the constitutionality of the act. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, with leave to the defendant to answer within six days upon payment of costs in this court and in the court below.

Lordi v. People's Surety Co., 119 N.Y.S. 1133 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

119 N.Y.S. 1133 (Lordi v. People's Surety Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related