Lord v. Maryland Casualty Co.
This text of 202 N.E.2d 239 (Lord v. Maryland Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed. The petitioners show no error in the order
denying their application for leave to file “information in the nature of a [769]*769quo warranto” to raise the issue of the right of the respondent to decline to furnish them with motor vehicle insurance other than the minimum compulsory liability insurance. Nothing is averred to show “the exercise [by the respondent] of a franchise or privilege not conferred by law.” G. L. e. 249, § 6. Goddard v. Smithett, 3 Gray, 116, 120. See Gardner Trust Co. v. Whitehall Corp. 260 Mass. 239, 240. Compare Adams v. Hannah, 261 Mass. 125.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 N.E.2d 239, 348 Mass. 768, 1964 Mass. LEXIS 960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lord-v-maryland-casualty-co-mass-1964.