Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. Haynes

724 N.E.2d 410, 88 Ohio St. 3d 164
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 23, 2000
DocketNo. 99-1889
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 724 N.E.2d 410 (Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. Haynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. Haynes, 724 N.E.2d 410, 88 Ohio St. 3d 164 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Given respondent’s solitary act of neglect in an otherwise unblemished legal career and the lack of financial harm to his client, a public reprimand is warranted. See Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. Smith (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 402, 709 N.E.2d 116; Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Kates (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 69, 676 N.E.2d 512; Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. Tscholl (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 211, 567 N.E.2d 265. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Haynes (Slip Opinion)
2020 Ohio 1570 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2020)
Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Haynes
2000 Ohio 293 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
724 N.E.2d 410, 88 Ohio St. 3d 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lorain-county-bar-assn-v-haynes-ohio-2000.