Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Smith

709 N.E.2d 116, 85 Ohio St. 3d 402
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 28, 1999
DocketNo. 98-2216
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 709 N.E.2d 116 (Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Smith, 709 N.E.2d 116, 85 Ohio St. 3d 402 (Ohio 1999).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. However, in view of respondent’s unblemished record and his lack of intent to harm Mehls, we find that a public reprimand is appropriate. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Smith
873 N.E.2d 1224 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Kelley
2001 Ohio 1317 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kelley
755 N.E.2d 338 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. Haynes
724 N.E.2d 410 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Haynes
2000 Ohio 293 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. Smith
1999 Ohio 402 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
709 N.E.2d 116, 85 Ohio St. 3d 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lake-county-bar-assn-v-smith-ohio-1999.