Lora v. Hollenhorst

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6079

WILFREDO GONZALEZ LORA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS M. HOLLENHORST, Assistant United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, in his official and personal capacities; ROBERT TRENT, Immigration and Naturalization Service’s Officer, in his official and personal capacities; JIM TRUSTY, State Attorney for Montgomery County, Maryland, in his official and personal capacities; ALAN B. SOSCHIN, Attorney At Law, in his official and personal capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-02-757-2)

Submitted: April 10, 2003 Decided: April 29, 2003

Before TRAXLER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his Bivens* complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b)(1) (2000), and denying his motion filed under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Lora v. Hollenhorst, No. CA-02-757-2 (E.D. Va.

Sept. 30, 2002; Dec. 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).