Lopez v. Young

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6370

JOSE LOPEZ,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

S. K. YOUNG; RICHARD PHILLIPS; D. GREER, Officer D. Greer or Greek; SERGEANT BURTIN; LIEUTENANT RAYNOLDS, Lieutenant Raynolds or Reynolds; C/O KING; C/O BUCHANAN; MAJOR YATES; COUNSELOR YEARY; C/O BELLAMY; SERGEANT COLLINS; MICHAEL FLEMING, a/k/a C/O Flemings; TOMMY JACKSON, a/k/a C/O Jackson; PAUL OHAI, a/k/a Doctor Ohai, M.D.; TAMMY THOMAS, a/k/a Ms. Thomas, Nurse; LIEUTENANT DONNIE LESTER, a/k/a Lieutenant Lester; SERGEANT BENTLEY; SERGEANT ANDERSON; F. WILLIS, Investigator; TERESA L. JOHNSON, also known as Medical Director T. Johnson; MR. PHILIPS, Assistant Warden of Programs; MS. BAKER, Counselor; KENNETH SLATER, a/k/a Doctor Stater, M.D.; C/O BLILEY; BRIAN KISER, a/k/a C/O Kiser; S. K. YOUNG, Warden; R. A. YOUNG, Regional Director,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:01-cv-00876-jct)

Submitted: July 24, 2007 Decided: July 30, 2007

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose Lopez, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Dana L. Gay, Noelle Leigh Shaw-Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Edward Joseph McNelis, III, John David McChesney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia; George W. Wooten, WOOTENHART, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia; Peter Duane Vieth, CRANDALL & KATT, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Jose Lopez appeals the district court’s order denying his

“motion for review based on grounds of newly discovered evidence

and information discovered after judgment.” We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Lopez v. Young, No.

7:01-cv-00876-jct (W.D. Va. Feb. 27, 2007). We also deny Lopez’

motion to lift stay and for leave to file a consolidated appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -