Lopez v. Young

Fourth Circuit

Lopez v. Young

235 F. App'x 92

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 30, 2007·No. No. 07-6370·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jose Lopez appeals the district court’s order denying his “motion for review based on grounds of newly discovered evidence and information discovered after judgment.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lopez v. Young, No. 7:01-cv-00876-jct (W.D.Va. Feb. 27, 2007). We also deny Lopez’ motion to lift stay and for leave to file a consolidated appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jose Lopez appeals the district court’s order denying his “motion for review based on grounds of newly discovered evidence and information discovered after judgment.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lopez v. Young, No. 7:01-cv-00876-jct (W.D.Va. Feb. 27, 2007). We also deny Lopez’ motion to lift stay and for leave to file a consolidated appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Lopez v. Young, 235 F. App'x 92 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

235 F. App'x 92 (Lopez v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.