Lopez v. SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. California
DecidedMarch 14, 2023
Docket3:23-cv-00455
StatusUnknown

This text of Lopez v. SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc. (Lopez v. SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lopez v. SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc., (S.D. Cal. 2023).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CRISTIAN LOPEZ, Case No.: 23-CV-455-W-WVG

12 Plaintiff, NOTICE AND ORDER FOR 13 v. (1) EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION CONFERENCE, 14 SEAWORLD PARKS & (2) CASE MANAGEMENT ENTERTAINMENT, INC; and DOES 1 15 CONFERENCE, AND through 100, inclusive, (3) TELEPHONIC STATUS 16 Defendants. CONFERENCE 17 18 19 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that an Early Neutral Evaluation (“ENE”) of your case 20 and Case Management Conference (“CMC”) will be held on May 10, 2023, at 9:00 a.m., 21 before United States Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo. These conferences will be held 22 via Zoom videoconference as set forth in Appendix A. 23 Additionally, on May 3, 2023, beginning at 2:00 p.m., the Court will hold an 24 attorneys-only telephonic status conference with each party separately.1 The purpose of 25

26 27 1 The Court will contact the first party and proceed to contact the remaining parties one at a time. Each call may be short or lengthy. Counsel are required to be available for the 28 1 this confidential, off-the-record teleconference is for the Court’s benefit in assessing each 2 party’s concerns, challenges, and whether the Court can assist in alleviating these. On or 3 before April 19, 2023, each attorney intending to participate shall lodge, via electronic 4 mail addressed to efile_Gallo@casd.uscourts.gov, (1) the name of each attorney who will 5 participate and (2) a telephone number at which each attorney may be reached directly 6 without fail at the time of the conference. 7 I. EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION CONFERENCE 8 The following are mandatory guidelines for the parties preparing for the ENE 9 Conference. 10 1. Purpose of Conference 11 The purpose of the ENE is to permit an informal discussion between the attorneys, 12 parties and the settlement judge of every aspect of the lawsuit in an effort to achieve an 13 early resolution of the case. All conference discussions will be informal, off the record, 14 privileged and confidential. Counsel for non-English speaking parties is responsible for 15 arranging for the appearance of an interpreter at the conference. 16 2. Personal Participation of Parties Required 17 All parties, adjusters for insured defendants, and other representatives of a party 18 having full and complete authority to enter into a binding settlement, and the principal 19 attorneys responsible for the litigation, must participate in the ENE and be legally and 20 factually prepared to discuss settlement of the case. See S.D. Cal. Civ. L. R. 16.1(c). Given 21 the current ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and related travel and health concerns, the ENE 22 and CMC will be held via Zoom videoconference, the procedures for which are set forth 23 in Appendix A to this Order. 24 25

26 27 counsel has not received a call from chambers after 20 minutes, counsel is directed to call chambers at (619) 557-6384. If multiple counsel will appear for a party, all counsel shall 28 1 3. Full Settlement Authority Required 2 In addition to counsel who will try the case, a party or party representative with full 3 settlement authority2 must participate in the conference. In the case of a corporate entity, 4 an authorized representative of the corporation who is not retained outside counsel must 5 participate and must have discretionary authority to commit the company to pay an amount 6 up to the amount of the plaintiff’s prayer (excluding punitive damage prayers). The purpose 7 of this requirement is to have representatives present who can settle the case during the 8 course of the conference without consulting a superior. 9 Counsel for a government entity may be excused from this requirement so long as 10 the government attorney who attends the ENE conference (1) has primary responsibility 11 for handling the case; and (2) may negotiate settlement offers which the attorney is willing 12 to recommend to the government official who has ultimate settlement authority. 13 4. Settlement Proposal and Response Required 14 No later than April 5, 2023, Plaintiff shall submit to Defendant(s) a written 15 settlement proposal. No later than April 12, 2023, Defendant(s) shall submit a response 16 to Plaintiff’s settlement proposal. All parties shall be prepared to address in their ENE 17 Statements, and discuss at the ENE conference, the settlement proposal and response. 18 5. ENE Statements Required 19 In accordance with the Court’s Chambers Rules, each party shall exchange its 20

21 2 “Full authority to settle” means that the individuals at the settlement conference must be 22 authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement 23 terms acceptable to the parties. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648 (7th Cir. 1989). The person needs to have “unfettered discretion and authority” to 24 change the settlement position of a party. Pitman v. Brinker Intl., Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 25 485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose of requiring a person with unlimited settlement authority to attend the conference includes that the person’s view of the case may be altered 26 during the face to face conference. Id. at 486. A limited or a sum certain of authority is not 27 adequate. The person with full settlement authority must be able to negotiate a settlement without being restricted by any predetermined level of authority. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, 28 1 settlement Statement with all opposing parties. Additionally, in accordance with the 2 Court’s Chambers Rules, each party shall submit a confidential or non-confidential 3 Statement to the Court. Both the exchange of Statements between the parties and 4 submissions of Statements to the Court shall occur on or before April 19, 2023. The 5 Statement each party submits directly to the chambers shall be five pages or less and shall 6 outline the nature of the case, the claims, the defenses, and the parties’ positions regarding 7 settlement of, and attempts to settle the case. All Statements must comply with the 8 Court’s Chambers Rules. 9 The parties shall meet and confer in good faith prior to the ENE Conference and 10 verify that they have done so in their respective ENE Conference statements, outlining the 11 substance of their discussions and negotiations. 12 6. Time Allotted 13 The Court generally allots two hours for ENEs. Counsel should be prepared to be 14 succinct and to the point. Requests for additional time must be made in writing in the 15 party’s ENE statement, accompanied by a short explanation. 16 7. New Parties Must Be Notified by Plaintiff’s Counsel 17 Plaintiff’s counsel shall give notice of the ENE Conference to all parties responding 18 to the Complaint after the date of this Notice. 19 8. Requests to Continue an ENE Conference 20 Civil Local Rule 16.1(c) requires that an ENE take place within 45 days of the filing 21 of the first answer. Requests to continue ENE conferences are rarely granted. Counsel 22 seeking to reschedule an ENE must first confer with opposing counsel. The Court will 23 consider formal, written ex parte requests to continue an ENE conference when 24 extraordinary circumstances exist that make a continuance appropriate. Absent 25 extraordinary circumstances, requests for continuances of the ENE conference will 26 not be considered unless submitted in writing no less than seven calendar days prior 27 to the scheduled conference, and only after conferring with opposing counsel. 28 1 Please refer to the undersigned’s Chambers Rules for additional guidance regarding 2 areas which must be addressed in the request. 3 The parties shall be prepared to engage in good faith settlement discussions with the 4 ||Court and opposing parties during the ENE Conference. Failure to engage in good faith 5 || settlement discussions may result in the imposition of sanctions. 6 Tl.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pitman v. Brinker International, Inc.
216 F.R.D. 481 (D. Arizona, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lopez v. SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopez-v-seaworld-parks-entertainment-inc-casd-2023.