Lopez v. SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California·Decided March 14, 2023·No. 3:23-cv-00455·Unknown

Opinion

CRISTIAN LOPEZ, Case No.: 23-CV-455-W-WVG

Plaintiff, NOTICE AND ORDER FOR v. (1) EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION CONFERENCE, (2) CASE MANAGEMENT ENTERTAINMENT, INC; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, (3) TELEPHONIC STATUS Defendants. CONFERENCE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that an Early Neutral Evaluation (“ENE”) of your case and Case Management Conference (“CMC”) will be held on May 10, 2023, at 9:00 a.m., before United States Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo. These conferences will be held via Zoom videoconference as set forth in Appendix A. Additionally, on May 3, 2023, beginning at 2:00 p.m., the Court will hold an attorneys-only telephonic status conference with each party separately.1 The purpose of

1 The Court will contact the first party and proceed to contact the remaining parties one at a time. Each call may be short or lengthy. Counsel are required to be available for the this confidential, off-the-record teleconference is for the Court’s benefit in assessing each party’s concerns, challenges, and whether the Court can assist in alleviating these. On or before April 19, 2023, each attorney intending to participate shall lodge, via electronic mail addressed to efile_Gallo@casd.uscourts.gov, (1) the name of each attorney who will participate and (2) a telephone number at which each attorney may be reached directly without fail at the time of the conference. The following are mandatory guidelines for the parties preparing for the ENE Conference. 1. Purpose of Conference The purpose of the ENE is to permit an informal discussion between the attorneys, parties and the settlement judge of every aspect of the lawsuit in an effort to achieve an early resolution of the case. All conference discussions will be informal, off the record, privileged and confidential. Counsel for non-English speaking parties is responsible for arranging for the appearance of an interpreter at the conference. 2. Personal Participation of Parties Required All parties, adjusters for insured defendants, and other representatives of a party having full and complete authority to enter into a binding settlement, and the principal attorneys responsible for the litigation, must participate in the ENE and be legally and factually prepared to discuss settlement of the case. See S.D. Cal. Civ. L. R. 16.1(c). Given the current ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and related travel and health concerns, the ENE and CMC will be held via Zoom videoconference, the procedures for which are set forth in Appendix A to this Order.

counsel has not received a call from chambers after 20 minutes, counsel is directed to call chambers at (619) 557-6384. If multiple counsel will appear for a party, all counsel shall 3. Full Settlement Authority Required In addition to counsel who will try the case, a party or party representative with full settlement authority2 must participate in the conference. In the case of a corporate entity, an authorized representative of the corporation who is not retained outside counsel must participate and must have discretionary authority to commit the company to pay an amount up to the amount of the plaintiff’s prayer (excluding punitive damage prayers). The purpose of this requirement is to have representatives present who can settle the case during the course of the conference without consulting a superior. Counsel for a government entity may be excused from this requirement so long as the government attorney who attends the ENE conference (1) has primary responsibility for handling the case; and (2) may negotiate settlement offers which the attorney is willing to recommend to the government official who has ultimate settlement authority. 4. Settlement Proposal and Response Required No later than April 5, 2023, Plaintiff shall submit to Defendant(s) a written settlement proposal. No later than April 12, 2023, Defendant(s) shall submit a response to Plaintiff’s settlement proposal. All parties shall be prepared to address in their ENE Statements, and discuss at the ENE conference, the settlement proposal and response. 5. ENE Statements Required In accordance with the Court’s Chambers Rules, each party shall exchange its

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lopez v. SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc., (S.D. Cal. 2023).

Lopez v. SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc. (Lopez v. SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pitman v. Brinker International, Inc.
216 F.R.D. 481 (D. Arizona, 2003)