Lopez, Juan Martin
This text of Lopez, Juan Martin (Lopez, Juan Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-86,477-01
EX PARTE JUAN MARTIN LOPEZ, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. CR-04-0780-A IN THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT FROM HAYS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). A jury convicted Applicant of several
child-sex offenses against four victims. There was no direct appeal.
Applicant argues that he is actually innocent. He states that two of the four victims provided
recantations, and the State argues why the recantations are not credible. These recantations were not
made part of the habeas record to this Court, and the trial court did not hold an evidentiary hearing.
We believe that, in recantation cases such as this one, before we make the important decision of
whether Applicant is entitled to relief, the record should be more fully developed. The trial court -2-
shall therefore conduct a live evidentiary hearing on the matter. The trial court shall weigh the
evidence of Applicant’s guilt, including all of the testimony at trial, against the new evidence of
innocence. See Ex parte Tuley, 109 S.W.3d 388, 393 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). The trial court shall
enter findings of fact as to the credibility of each witness and as to whether Applicant is actually
innocent of the offenses. The trial court shall also supplement the record to this Court with the
recantations Applicant provided.
It does not appear that Applicant is represented by habeas counsel. If not, the trial court,
within 30 days of the date of this order, shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant
is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to
represent Applicant at the evidentiary hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
Delivered: April 12, 2017 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lopez, Juan Martin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopez-juan-martin-texcrimapp-2017.