Loose-Wiles Biscuit Co. v. Town of Sanford

157 S.E. 432, 200 N.C. 467, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 362
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 18, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 157 S.E. 432 (Loose-Wiles Biscuit Co. v. Town of Sanford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loose-Wiles Biscuit Co. v. Town of Sanford, 157 S.E. 432, 200 N.C. 467, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 362 (N.C. 1931).

Opinion

Stacy, O. J.

The appeal presents the single question whether the facts of the instant ease bring it within the principle announced in Thompson v. Lumberton, 182 N. C., 260, 108 S. E., 722, or the exception to the general rule as applied in Advertising Co. v. Asheville, 189 N. C., 737, 128 S. E., 149. We have concluded that the case is controlled by the decisions in Thompson v. Lumberton, supra, Turner v. New Bern, *469 187 N. C., 541, 122 S. E., 469, Paul v. Washington, 134 N. C., 363, 47 S. E., 793, Rosenbaum v. New Bern, 118 N. C., 83, 24 S. E., 1, and others of like import.

The general rule is, that equity will not interfere by injunction to test the validity of an alleged unlawful or invalid municipal ordinance. Wardens v. Washington, 109 N. C., 21, 13 S. E., 700; Scott v. Smith, 121 N. C., 94, 28 S. E., 64; Cohen v. Comrs., 17 N. C., 2.

. There is an exception to this general rule, however, as well established as the rule itself, that equity will enjoin the threatened enforcement of an alleged unconstitutional law when it is made manifest that otherwise property rights or the rights of persons would suffer irreparable injury. Advertising Co. v. Asheville, supra. See, also, concurring opinions in Turner v. New Bern, supra, and R. R. v. Goldshoro, 155 N. G, 356, 71 S. E., 514.

The plaintiff could hardly regard the payment under protest of a $100 tax, with adequate legal remedy to recover it back, if unlawful, as an irreparable injury to its business. C. S., 7979; R. R. v. Comrs., 188 N. C., 265, 124 S. E., 560.

Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lewis v. Goodman
188 S.E.2d 709 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)
Walker v. City of Charlotte
138 S.E.2d 501 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1964)
Schloss v. Jamison
128 S.E.2d 590 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
City of Durham v. Public Service Co. of North Carolina, Inc.
126 S.E.2d 315 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
Roller v. Allen
96 S.E.2d 851 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
Davis v. City of Charlotte
89 S.E.2d 406 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
Jarrell v. . Snow
35 S.E.2d 273 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1945)
Clinard v. City of Winston-Salem
6 S.E.2d 867 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
Hilton v. . Harris
177 S.E. 411 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
Flemming v. City of Asheville
172 S.E. 362 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
Chappell v. . Mowery
163 S.E. 565 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 S.E. 432, 200 N.C. 467, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loose-wiles-biscuit-co-v-town-of-sanford-nc-1931.