Looney v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Looney v. State

627 So. 2d 1245, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13048, 1993 WL 499243

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 7, 1993

DocketNo. 93-1561

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 627 So. 2d 1245 (Looney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Looney v. State, 627 So. 2d 1245, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13048, 1993 WL 499243 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying Appellant’s Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence, filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. See Layton v. State, 432 So.2d 195 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). In doing so, we reject Appellant’s argument that the experimental guidelines, created by Chapter 79-362, Laws of Florida, were invalid as an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority. Rather, those guidelines were created as part of a pilot program and implemented in four judicial circuits “for the purpose of testing the feasibility of developing and implementing sentencing guidelines.” See Smith v. State, 537 So.2d 982, 984 (Fla.1989).

AFFIRMED.

ZEHMER, C.J., and MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying Appellant’s Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence, filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. See Layton v. State, 432 So.2d 195 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). In doing so, we reject Appellant’s argument that the experimental guidelines, created by Chapter 79-362, Laws of Florida, were invalid as an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority. Rather, those guidelines were created as part of a pilot program and implemented in four judicial circuits “for the purpose of testing the feasibility of developing and implementing sentencing guidelines.” See Smith v. State, 537 So.2d 982, 984 (Fla.1989).

AFFIRMED.

ZEHMER, C.J., and MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

627 So. 2d 1245, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13048, 1993 WL 499243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/looney-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack