Lonnie A. Overton v. R. James Nicholson
20 Vet. App. 494, 2006 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1133, 2006 WL 3059926
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims·Decided October 27, 2006·No. 02-1814·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinions
ORDER
During the internal circulation of the panel decision in this matter, three judges requested full-Court consideration. See the Court’s Internal Operating Procedures ¶ V(b)(5).
On consideration of the foregoing, and it appearing that there is no majority in favor of the request for full-Court consideration, it is
ORDERED that full-Court consideration is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lonnie A. Overton v. R. James Nicholson, 20 Vet. App. 494, 2006 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1133, 2006 WL 3059926 (Cal. 2006).
20 Vet. App. 494 (Lonnie A. Overton v. R. James Nicholson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Angel Vazquez -Flores v. James B. Peake
22 Vet. App. 37 (Veterans Claims, 2008)
D ENNIS L. W ASHINGTON v. R. James Nicholson
21 Vet. App. 191 (Veterans Claims, 2007)