Long v. State

546 So. 2d 1152, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1786, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4374, 1989 WL 84305
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Long v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 558 So. 2d 1091
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 26, 1989·No. No. 87-02351·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals his convictions and sentences for delivery of cocaine, possession of cocaine, and possession of cocaine with intent to sell. The sentences were imposed on revocation of his probation. The defendant raises on direct appeal the possibility that the convictions arise from a single act of possession. Gordon v. State, 528 So.2d 910 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). We affirm on all issues because the record on appeal is insufficient to resolve this issue, even after this court gave the appellant opportunity to supplement the record with additional information from the trial court’s existing record. This affirmance is without prejudice to the defendant’s ability to seek post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

Affirmed.

FRANK, A.C.J., and HALL and ALTENBERND,. JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Long v. State, 546 So. 2d 1152, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1786, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4374, 1989 WL 84305 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

546 So. 2d 1152 (Long v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gordon v. State
528 So. 2d 910 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)