Long v. General Motors Corporation

284 S.W.3d 779, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 795
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 9, 2009·No. ED 92115·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

General Motors Corporation appeals the Final Award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) af-fii’ming the administrative law judge’s decision finding Judith Long permanently and totally disabled and awarding her worker’s compensation benefits and finding the Second Injury Fund had no liability-

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. The Commission’s Final Award is supported by competent and substantial evidence in the record as a whole, and no error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Long v. General Motors Corporation, 284 S.W.3d 779, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 795 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

284 S.W.3d 779 (Long v. General Motors Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kaplan v. Krulik
284 S.W.3d 779 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)