Kaplan v. Krulik

284 S.W.3d 779, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 785, 2009 WL 1590595
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 9, 2009·No. ED 92062·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anita Krulik n/k/a Anita Greives (Rru-lik) appeals from the Amended Order and Judgment entered on January 29, 2009 setting aside two previous judgments and orders and entering an order for a new trial.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. We affirm the trial court’s judgment, pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kaplan v. Krulik, 284 S.W.3d 779, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 785, 2009 WL 1590595 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

284 S.W.3d 779 (Kaplan v. Krulik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Long v. General Motors Corporation
284 S.W.3d 779 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)