Long v. Board of Parole

346 Or. App. 70

• Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon
• Decided: December 24, 2025
• Docket: A184852
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

70 December 24, 2025 No. 1114

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

JOSEPH CHARLES LONG, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. A184852

Submitted November 14, 2025. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, Oregon Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for petitioner. Philip Thoennes, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for respondent. Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge. EGAN, J. Affirmed. Nonprecedential Memo Op: 346 Or App 70 (2025) 71

EGAN, J. Petitioner seeks judicial review of a final order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board). Petitioner’s appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to ORAP 5.90 and State v. Balfour, 311 Or 434, 814 P2d 1069 (1991). The brief does not contain a Section B. See ORAP 5.90(1)(b). We affirm.1 The board revoked petitioner’s supervision and imposed a 90-day sanction based on its determinations that petitioner had violated conditions of his supervision requir- ing him to report to his supervisory officer as directed, obey all laws, and have no contact with specified individuals. Having reviewed the record and the Balfour brief, we have identified no arguably meritorious issues. Affirmed.

1 As authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b), this matter is determined by a two-judge panel.