London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Cox
This text of 137 S.E. 799 (London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case, which arose under the workmen’s compensation law, and in which the plaintiffs in error excepted to a judgment of the superior court affirming an award of compensation for an alleged hernia, the questions presented by the record are controlled adversely to the plaintiffs in error by the decision of this court in London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Shockley, 31 Ga. App. 762 (122 S. E. 99). See also, Bell v. Hayes-Ionia Co., 192 Mich. 90 (158 N. W. 179).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 S.E. 799, 36 Ga. App. 708, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/london-guarantee-accident-co-v-cox-gactapp-1927.