London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Cox

137 S.E. 799, 36 Ga. App. 708, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 262
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 16, 1927·No. 17649·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bell, J.

In this case, which arose under the workmen’s compensation law, and in which the plaintiffs in error excepted to a judgment of the superior court affirming an award of compensation for an alleged hernia, the questions presented by the record are controlled adversely to the plaintiffs in error by the decision of this court in London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Shockley, 31 Ga. App. 762 (122 S. E. 99). See also, Bell v. Hayes-Ionia Co., 192 Mich. 90 (158 N. W. 179).

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Cox, 137 S.E. 799, 36 Ga. App. 708, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 262 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

137 S.E. 799 (London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
144 S.E. 343 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)