Lombardo v. Thomas
This text of 53 A.D.3d 549 (Lombardo v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Grella, J.), dated November 20, 2006, which, on the ground, inter alia, of untimeliness, denied his objections to an order of the same court (Beck-Cahn, S.M.), dated August 28, 2006, which, after a hearing, inter alia, directed him to pay the sum of $2,286 per month as basic child support.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
On appeal, the father does not challenge the Family Court’s denial of his objections to a Support Magistrate’s determination concerning issues of child support as untimely filed (see Family Ct Act § 439 [e]; Matter of Burke v Burke, 45 AD3d 591, 592 [2007]; Matter of Hodges v Hodges, 40 AD3d 639 [2007]). Thus, the order denying his objections must be affirmed. Mastro, J.P., Spolzino, Ritter and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 A.D.3d 549, 859 N.Y.S.2d 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lombardo-v-thomas-nyappdiv-2008.