Lolong v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 19, 2006·No. 03-72384·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARJORIE KONDA LOLONG,  Petitioner, No. 03-72384 v.  Agency No. A77-427-355 ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, ORDER Respondent.  Filed June 19, 2006

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three- judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

6901 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lolong v. Gonzales, (9th Cir. 2006).

Lolong v. Gonzales (Lolong v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pardede v. Holder
416 F. App'x 623 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Nataliya Dudkevich v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
470 F. App'x 591 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)