LOLETHA DENISE HALE v. ABSM INVESTMENTS, LLC
This text of LOLETHA DENISE HALE v. ABSM INVESTMENTS, LLC (LOLETHA DENISE HALE v. ABSM INVESTMENTS, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ April 16, 2024
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A24E0059. LOLETHA DENISE HALE v. ABSM INVESTMENTS, LLC et al.
Loletha Denise Hale has filed an emergency motion seeking an extension of time to file an application for discretionary appeal from the superior court’s April 9, 2024 order (1) denying Hale’s request for a declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, and attorney fees and granting ABSM Investments, LLC’s motion for judgment on the pleadings related to a tax foreclosure sale; and (2) issuing a writ of possession in favor of ABSM.1 In the motion, Hale requests an extension of up to 60 days to file her application.
The grant or denial of injunctive relief is directly appealable. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (4); Jones v. Peach Trader, Inc., 302 Ga. 504, 511 (III) (807 SE2d 840) (2017). As a result, to the extent Hale seeks to appeal the superior court’s denial of her petition for injunctive relief, declaratory judgment, and attorney fees, no application was required.2
1 The two actions were consolidated in the superior court. 2 See OCGA § 5-6-34 (d) (“Where an appeal is taken under any provision of subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this Code section, all judgments, rulings, or orders rendered in the case which are raised on appeal and which may affect the proceedings below shall be reviewed and determined by the appellate court, without regard to the appealability of the judgment, ruling, or order standing alone and without regard to whether the judgment, ruling, or order appealed from was final or was appealable by some other express provision of law contained in this Code section, or elsewhere.”). Accordingly, Hale’s emergency motion is hereby DENIED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 04/16/2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
LOLETHA DENISE HALE v. ABSM INVESTMENTS, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loletha-denise-hale-v-absm-investments-llc-gactapp-2024.