Logan v. Adams Machine Co.
This text of 135 Ala. 475 (Logan v. Adams Machine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There are a number of assignments of error upon the record, but all of them, except the last one, which is not insisted upon, are as to matters that should have been presented by bill of exceptions. Indeed the only ones that seem to be insisted on in brief of counsel for appellant are those involved in the action of the court in striking pleas 3-, 4 and 5 upon motion of plaintiff. With no bill of exceptions in the record the rulings of the court in this respect cannot be reviewed. Holley v. Coffee, 123 Ala. 406; Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Joseph, 125 Ala. 313; Cottingham v. Greely-Barnham Grocery Co., 129 Ala. 200; Randall v. Wadsworth, 130 Ala. 633; 3 Ency. Pl. & Pr. 400, 401; Elliott on App. Procedure, § 816.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 Ala. 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/logan-v-adams-machine-co-ala-1902.