Logan-Long Co. v. Lindley

413 N.E.2d 836, 64 Ohio St. 2d 156, 18 Ohio Op. 3d 378, 1980 Ohio LEXIS 853
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 23, 1980·No. No. 80-549·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Board of Tax Appeals, after consideration of an extensive record, determined that the safety devices on the elevators were not “normal maintenance items” as claimed by the commissioner, and that the other two items were within the purview of the exceptions contained in R. C. 5739.01(E)(2).

As this court delineated its own duties under R. C. 5717.04 in 3535 Salem Corp. v. Lindley (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 210, it is “***limited to determining whether the board’s decision is reasonable and lawful, and not to act as a trier of fact due novo. ”

The decision of the board in reversing the commissioner’s [157] assessments as to the three items at issue herein is neither unreasonable nor unlawful, and it is, therefore, affirmed.

Decision affirmed.

W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Holmes and Dowd, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C. J., and Locher, J., concur in the judgment only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Logan-Long Co. v. Lindley, 413 N.E.2d 836, 64 Ohio St. 2d 156, 18 Ohio Op. 3d 378, 1980 Ohio LEXIS 853 (Ohio 1980).

413 N.E.2d 836 (Logan-Long Co. v. Lindley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bird & Son, Inc. v. Limbach
543 N.E.2d 1161 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1989)