Loesing v. T. I. McCormack Trucking Co.
253 A.D. 759, 1 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5484
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 24, 1937·Published
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for the death of the plaintiff’s intestate through the negligence of the respondent, judgment dismissing the complaint reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. In the opinion of tMs court, the evidence presented a question of fact for the jury. (Hart v. Hudson River Bridge Co., 80 N. Y. 622.) Hagarty, Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Loesing v. T. I. McCormack Trucking Co., 253 A.D. 759, 1 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5484 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
253 A.D. 759 (Loesing v. T. I. McCormack Trucking Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hart v. . Hudson River Bridge Company
80 N.Y. 622 (New York Court of Appeals, 1880)