Loesing v. T. I. McCormack Trucking Co.

253 A.D. 759, 1 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5484

This text of 253 A.D. 759 (Loesing v. T. I. McCormack Trucking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loesing v. T. I. McCormack Trucking Co., 253 A.D. 759, 1 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5484 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for the death of the plaintiff’s intestate through the negligence of the respondent, judgment dismissing the complaint reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. In the opinion of tMs court, the evidence presented a question of fact for the jury. (Hart v. Hudson River Bridge Co., 80 N. Y. 622.) Hagarty, Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hart v. . Hudson River Bridge Company
80 N.Y. 622 (New York Court of Appeals, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 A.D. 759, 1 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loesing-v-t-i-mccormack-trucking-co-nyappdiv-1937.