Hart v. . Hudson River Bridge Company

80 N.Y. 622, 1880 N.Y. LEXIS 137
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 3, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by86 cases

This text of 80 N.Y. 622 (Hart v. . Hudson River Bridge Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hart v. . Hudson River Bridge Company, 80 N.Y. 622, 1880 N.Y. LEXIS 137 (N.Y. 1880).

Opinion

Per Curiam

opinion for reversal and1 new trial.

All concur, except Folger and Earl, JJ., dissenting.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beutenmiller v. West End Tavern, Inc.
285 A.D. 820 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)
In Re the Accounting of Seigle
45 N.E.2d 809 (New York Court of Appeals, 1942)
Witkowicz v. Amalgamated Properties, Inc.
264 A.D. 156 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)
Ingersoll v. Liberty Bank of Buffalo
14 N.E.2d 828 (New York Court of Appeals, 1938)
Volberg v. Hegeman Farms Co.
253 A.D. 839 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
Loesing v. T. I. McCormack Trucking Co.
253 A.D. 759 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Dandino v. New York Central R.R. Co.
6 N.E.2d 397 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)
Cook v. Gillot
249 A.D. 830 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Hotop v. English & Greenfader, Inc.
248 A.D. 774 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
Tortora v. State of New York
199 N.E. 44 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)
Hagen v. American Machine & Foundry Co.
243 A.D. 625 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)
Kmeth v. Delehanty
242 A.D. 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
Brown v. Steamship Terminal Operating Corp.
242 A.D. 784 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
McVeigh v. New York Life Insurance
230 A.D. 136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)
LaRose v. Donnelly
219 A.D. 181 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)
Ciaramella v. Orr
216 A.D. 247 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)
Forbes v. City of Jamestown
212 A.D. 332 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)
Warner v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.
209 A.D. 211 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)
Swistak v. Erie Railroad
208 A.D. 553 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)
Schweinler v. Earl
183 A.D. 673 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 N.Y. 622, 1880 N.Y. LEXIS 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-hudson-river-bridge-company-ny-1880.