Loeb v. Schmith
1 Mont. 87
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order of the second judicial district court setting aside a judgment entered in vacation by default, against Henry Eppel or Apple, one of the defendants below, with leave to answer, upon payment of costs. The setting aside of the default rested in the discretion of the court below upon the facts disclosed in the affidavit, and we see no such abuse of that discretion as calls for the interposition of this court.
The order is affirmed and the cause remanded.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Loeb v. Schmith, 1 Mont. 87 (Mo. 1868).
1 Mont. 87 (Loeb v. Schmith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wolfe v. Schulz Refrigeration
Montana Supreme Court, 1979
Shields v. Pirkle Refrigerated Freight Lines, Inc.
591 P.2d 1120 (Montana Supreme Court, 1979)
Lake v. Lake
182 P.2d 824 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1947)
Hallett v. Slaughter
140 P.2d 3 (California Supreme Court, 1943)
Reynolds v. Gladys Belle Oil Co.
243 P. 576 (Montana Supreme Court, 1926)
Donlan v. Thompson Falls Copper & Milling Co.
112 P. 445 (Montana Supreme Court, 1910)
Pengelly v. Peeler
101 P. 147 (Montana Supreme Court, 1909)
Greene v. Rowan
74 P. 456 (Montana Supreme Court, 1903)
Eakins v. Kemper
53 P. 310 (Montana Supreme Court, 1898)