Loeb v. Loeb
This text of 240 A.D. 912 (Loeb v. Loeb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order granting defendants’ motion for a bill of particulars reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The plaintiff relies upon a general course of conduct in an alienation action. The general rule applicable to such a pleading is that a bill of particulars may not be exacted with respect thereto. (Kirby v. Kirby, 34 App. Div. 25; Ketcham v. Ketcham, 32 id. 26; Earle v. Earle, 79 id. 631; Van Olinda v. Hall, 82 Hun, 357; Carrie v. Davis, 41 App. Div. 520.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D. 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loeb-v-loeb-nyappdiv-1933.