Loeb v. Loeb

240 A.D. 912
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1933·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order granting defendants’ motion for a bill of particulars reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The plaintiff relies upon a general course of conduct in an alienation action. The general rule applicable to such a pleading is that a bill of particulars may not be exacted with respect thereto. (Kirby v. Kirby, 34 App. Div. 25; Ketcham v. Ketcham, 32 id. 26; Earle v. Earle, 79 id. 631; Van Olinda v. Hall, 82 Hun, 357; Carrie v. Davis, 41 App. Div. 520.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Loeb v. Loeb, 240 A.D. 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

240 A.D. 912 (Loeb v. Loeb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Charles v. Charles
17 Misc. 2d 932 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Shanik v. Shanik
207 Misc. 685 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)
Dwyer v. Chisesi
245 A.D. 843 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)