Kirby v. Kirby

34 A.D. 25
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 1, 1898·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The following is the opinion' of Barnard, J., at Special Term:

Barnard, J.:

A bill of particulars would be a difficult matter to frame in an action such as this. A wife charges her husband’s uncle with alienating her husband’s affection and breaking up her home. There is no impropriety alleged other than a continued depreciation of the plaintiff as a wife. Such a complaint must be made out by proof presumably of many instances and probably on many occasions; here a little and there a little. The general allegation is made: You depreciated me to my husband and destroyed my happiness. Such a general charge can be easily met.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirby v. Kirby, 34 A.D. 25 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).

34 A.D. 25 (Kirby v. Kirby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Loeb v. Loeb
240 A.D. 912 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)