Locklear v. Perry

19 F. App'x 124
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 26, 2001
Docket01-6501
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 19 F. App'x 124 (Locklear v. Perry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Locklear v. Perry, 19 F. App'x 124 (4th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Berry Locklear appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint in which he alleged application of excessive force. The record discloses he suffered de minimis injury. See Norman v. Taylor, 25 F.3d 1259 (4th Cir.1994) (en banc). Because Locklear has not alleged extraordinary circumstances warranting relief, we conclude summary judgment was appropriate. We deny Locklear’s motion to view a videotape contained in the record *125 and affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 F. App'x 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/locklear-v-perry-ca4-2001.