Locklear v. Palm Harbor Homes

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedAugust 1, 2008
DocketI.C. NOS. 395486 665675.
StatusPublished

This text of Locklear v. Palm Harbor Homes (Locklear v. Palm Harbor Homes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Locklear v. Palm Harbor Homes, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2008).

Opinion

***********
The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Baddour and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence. Accordingly, the Full Commission reverses the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner and enters the following Opinion and Award.

*********** *Page 2
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as:

STIPULATIONS
1. All parties are properly before the Industrial Commission, and the Industrial Commission has jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter.

2. All parties are subject to and bound by the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.

3. All parties have been properly designated and there is no question as to misjoinder or nonjoinder of parties.

4. The carrier on the risk for defendant-employer in I.C. No. 395486 was St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.

5. The carrier on the risk for defendant-employer in I.C. No. 665675 was American Home Assurance Company, and Broadspire was the processing agent.

6. Plaintiff sustained a compensable injury to his right knee on January 10, 2004 when he fell off a ladder and twisted his right knee in I.C. No. 395486.

7. Plaintiff underwent surgeries to his right knee on January 30, 2004, June 17, 2004, and January 9, 2006.

8. Plaintiff returned to work with defendant-employer on or about March 9, 2006 as a utility man.

9. Plaintiff alleges to have sustained a compensable injury to his right ankle, right knee, right wrist and right shoulder on October 2, 2006 when he was walking out of a modular home under production and stepped down a steep step while carrying a box of fixtures when his right knee gave way and he fell, striking the right side of his body on the ground. Plaintiff contends that the *Page 3 October 2, 2006 fall resulted from a give way response to the right knee previously injured on January 10, 2004 in I.C. No. 395486 and/or from stepping down a steep step while carrying a box of fixtures in I.C. No. 665675. Defendants deny plaintiff's allegations.

10. Defendants in I.C. No. 395486 have denied this claim based on its contention that they were not the carrier of record for the October 2, 2006 date of injury, and plaintiff's injury did not proximately result from his injury on January 10, 2004.

11. Defendants in I.C. No. 665675 have made no response to plaintiff's Form 18 (the evidence of record shows that a Form 61 was filed in response to plaintiff's Form 18).

12. An employment relationship existed between plaintiff and defendant-employer on January 10, 2004.

13. An employment relationship existed between plaintiff and defendant-employer on October 2, 2006.

14. Plaintiff's average weekly wage is $571.31, yielding a compensation rate of $380.89 in I.C. No. 395486. Plaintiff's average weekly wage in I.C. No. 665675 is subject to verification by a Form 22 wage chart.

15. Plaintiff has alleged that he has not worked since October 2, 2006.

16. On November 27, 2006, defendant St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company authorized an MRI of plaintiff's right knee which was without prejudice, and by letter dated November 29, 2006, plaintiff accepted the same.

17. Executive Secretary Tracey H. Weaver ordered I.C. No. 395486 and I.C. No. 665675 consolidated for the hearings and all further proceedings on June 26, 2007.

18. An MRI taken after the October 2, 2006 fall reflected a deranged right knee requiring surgery. *Page 4

19. Surgery for the right knee has not been authorized by either defendant-carrier.

***********
EXHIBITS
The Pre-Trial Agreement was marked as Stipulated Exhibit 1. In addition, the following Plaintiff's Exhibits were admitted into evidence by stipulation:

1. Exhibit A-I.C. Forms

2. Exhibit B-Medical Records

3. Exhibit C-Correspondence

4. Exhibit D-Form 28U

5. Exhibit E-March 16, 2007 Administrative Order

6. Exhibit F-Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration

7. Exhibit G-June 11, 2007 Administrative Order

8. Exhibit H-Plaintiff's Request for Expedited Hearing

9. Exhibit I-Responses of Defendant-employer and St. Paul to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents

10. Exhibit J-Plaintiff's Reponses to Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents of Defendant-employer and St. Paul

11. Exhibit K-Personnel File through 2005

12. Exhibit L-Incident Reports

13. Exhibit M-Termination Report

14. Subsequent to the evidentiary hearing, defendant-carrier American Home Assurance submitted a Form 22 with supporting documentation.

*********** *Page 5
Based upon all of the competent evidence of record and reasonable inferences flowing therefrom, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. At the time of the evidentiary hearing, plaintiff was thirty-three years old. Plaintiff was hired by defendant-employer Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. d/b/a Masterpiece Housing on March 11, 1994. Defendant-employer builds and sells manufactured homes.

2. The manufactured homes produced by defendant-employer are built inside of a large warehouse, and are moved around the warehouse on mechanical pushers. The mechanical pushers are floor joists covered with decking that sits on wheels ranging from eight (8) to ten (10) inches in diameter.

3. Plaintiff fell off a ladder and injured his right knee while working for defendant-employer on January 10, 2004.

4. On January 19, 2004, plaintiff presented to Dr. Joseph Zucker at Albemarle Orthopedic Services for evaluation of his right knee.

5. An MRI of plaintiff's right knee was performed at Cabarrus Diagnostic Imaging on January 21, 2004, which revealed a complete disruption of the anterior cruciate ligament, an extensive tear of the medial meniscus, and a strain of the lateral ligamentous complex.

6. On January 31, 2004, plaintiff underwent a medial meniscal repair, a cruciate ligament reconstruction with a bone-tendon-bone allograft, and a partial debridement of the tear of the lateral meniscus at Stanley Memorial Hospital.

7. Defendant-carrier St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company paid plaintiff's medical expenses and resulting indemnity compensation related to this surgery. *Page 6

8. After the January 31, 2004 right knee surgery, plaintiff was subsequently released back to work without restrictions by Dr. Zucker.

9. Plaintiff continued to have difficulty with his right knee including pain, swelling, and episodes of the knee giving way.

10. On May 18, 2004, plaintiff presented to Dr. Joseph Zucker at Albemarle Orthopedic Services and reported that at work the previous week he felt a popping sensation in his right knee, and that his right knee had developed some swelling.

11.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hollar v. Montclair Furniture Co., Inc.
269 S.E.2d 667 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)
Heatherly v. Montgomery Components, Inc.
323 S.E.2d 29 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1984)
Adams v. Burlington Industries, Inc.
300 S.E.2d 455 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1983)
Holley v. Acts, Inc.
581 S.E.2d 750 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2003)
Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.
57 S.E.2d 760 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
Early v. W. H. Basnight & Co.
198 S.E. 577 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Locklear v. Palm Harbor Homes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/locklear-v-palm-harbor-homes-ncworkcompcom-2008.