Lockett v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lockett v. State

236 S.W.3d 54, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1152, 2007 WL 2363476

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 21, 2007

DocketED 88288

StatusPublished

This text of 236 S.W.3d 54 (Lockett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lockett v. State, 236 S.W.3d 54, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1152, 2007 WL 2363476 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.'

Morris Lockett appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.'

Morris Lockett appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 S.W.3d 54, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1152, 2007 WL 2363476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lockett-v-state-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack