Locke v. Ford

187 S.E. 715, 54 Ga. App. 322, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 557
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 28, 1936
Docket25781
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 187 S.E. 715 (Locke v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Locke v. Ford, 187 S.E. 715, 54 Ga. App. 322, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 557 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

1. The operators of a taxicab business of transporting the general public for hire are carriers of passengers, and amenable to the legal duty of exercising extraordinary diligence for their protection. Code, §§ 18-201, 18-204; Durfey v. Milligan, 265 Mich. 97 (251 N. W. 356) ; 10 C. J. 606, 607, §§ 1033, 1034, and cit.

2. A child four and a half years old is conclusively presumed to be incapable of contributory negligence. Crawford v. So. Ry. Co., 106 Ga. 870 (2) (33 S. E. 826).

3. Ordinarily a common carrier of passengers by street-car or other conveyance on city streets discharges its legal duty to a passenger when it deposits him at a usual and reasonably safe place for alighting and crossing the street, and is under no obligation to wait until approaching automobiles have stopped, or to warn him of the usual dangers of traffic, which in his exercise of ordinary care would be avoidable. But a common carrier is not permitted to deposit a passenger at a place which it knows will reasonably expose him to unusual and unnecessary peril, and it may be held liable for a proximately resulting injury. Macon Railway & Light Co. v. Vining, 120 Ga. 511, 513 (48 S. E. 232) ; Augusta Ry. Co. v. Glover, 92 Ga. 132 (10), 146 (18 S. E. 406); Jernigan v. Georgia Power Co., 31 Ga. App. 273 (2, 3) (120 S. E. 439); Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. Gilbert, 39 Ga. App. 56 (146 S. E. 33) ; Metts v. L. & N. R. Co., 52 Ga. App. 115, 117 (182 S. E. 531); Martin v. Georgia Power Co., 45 Ga. App. 799 (165 S. E. 880); 10 C. J. 914, § 1340.

4. Voluntary, intentional concert in the acts of tort-feasors is not necessary to create joint liability, if the separate acts combine naturally and directly to produce, and thus constitute, the proximate cause of a single [323]*323injury. Kelly v. Georgia Railway & Power Co., 24 Ga. App. 439 (4) (101 S. E. 401); Scearce v. Gainesville, 33 Ga. App. 411 (3) (126 S. E. 883) ; McGinnis v. Shaw, 46 Ga. App. 248 (167 S. E. 533); Georgia Power Co. v. Kinard, 47 Ga. App. 483, 486 (170 S. E. 688) ; Longino v. Moore, 53 Ga. App. 674 (187 S. E. 203); and cit.

Decided September 28, 1936. Slade, Swift, Pease & Davidson, for plaintiff in error. W. B. Flournoy, Palmer & Wohlwender, contra.

5. The instant amended petition by a next friend of a child four and a half years old, suing the operators of a taxicab and the driver of a truck which ran over the child after the driver of the taxicab had deposited her between crossing streets in the center of a heavily-traveled city street, opposite a residence which was her destination, stated a cause of action as to the taxicab operators, who alone demurred and excepted. The court did not err in overruling their general demurrers. See Roden v. Conn. Co., 113 Conn. 408 (155 Atl. 721) ; 96 A. L. R., 732-734. Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Sutton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knight v. Atlanta Transit Sys., Inc.
224 S.E.2d 790 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Gilson v. Mitchell
205 S.E.2d 421 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Columbus Transportation Co. v. Curry
122 S.E.2d 584 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Bush v. New Jersey & New York Transit Co.
153 A.2d 28 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1959)
Doss v. Miller
73 S.E.2d 349 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Hanks v. Georgia Power Company
72 S.E.2d 198 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Dishinger v. Suburban Coach Co.
66 S.E.2d 242 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Edwards v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
183 F.2d 165 (Fifth Circuit, 1950)
Kennedy v. Ham Chevrolet Co.
57 S.E.2d 236 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Riggs v. Watson
47 S.E.2d 900 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Anthony v. Dutton
36 S.E.2d 836 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)
Georgia Power Co. v. Weaver
23 S.E.2d 730 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Jackson v. City of Seattle
131 P.2d 172 (Washington Supreme Court, 1942)
Co-Op Cab Company v. Singleton
19 S.E.2d 541 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Jordan v. Wiggins
18 S.E.2d 512 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
English v. Georgia Power Co.
17 S.E.2d 891 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Greeson v. Davis
9 S.E.2d 690 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Gazaway v. Nicholson
5 S.E.2d 391 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 S.E. 715, 54 Ga. App. 322, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/locke-v-ford-gactapp-1936.