Lochbrunner v. Sherman

27 Colo. 292
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedJanuary 15, 1900
DocketNo. 3932
StatusPublished

This text of 27 Colo. 292 (Lochbrunner v. Sherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lochbrunner v. Sherman, 27 Colo. 292 (Colo. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A motion to dismiss this appeal was heretofore made, upon the sole ground that the amount of the judgment was not sufficient to give this court jurisdiction. The same was denied, because the pecuniary test was not the sole criterion by which the appellate jurisdiction of this court is determined. We declined then to examine the record for the purpose of ascertaining whether, for any other reason, our jurisdiction attached. Lochbrunner v. Sherman, 26 Colo. 164.

This case being now finally submitted, an examination of the record discloses that the action was -originally brought. [293]*293to enjoin the sale of certain property under a trust deed; and that upon the trial the court ordered the trust deed foreclosed. The action does not relate to a franchise or freehold, and no constitutional question is involved. We are therefore without jurisdiction, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lochbrunner v. Sherman
26 Colo. 164 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Colo. 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lochbrunner-v-sherman-colo-1900.