Lochbrunner v. Sherman
This text of 26 Colo. 164 (Lochbrunner v. Sherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellees move to dismiss this appeal, upon the ground that the court is without jurisdiction to entertain it, the only reason assigned in support of the motion being, that the judgment appealed from is less than 12,500, exclusive of costs. So far as the amount of the judgment is concerned, the motion appears to be well taken, but the pecuniary test is not the sole criterion by which the appellate jurisdiction of this court is determined. Mills’ Code, sec. 406u. We cannot assume that because it may not have jurisdiction for one reason, it has not for any or all others; nor will we examine the record for the purpose of ascertaining, when all the grounds relating to jurisdiction are not raised, which, under the provisions of the code, supra, determine the jurisdiction of this court; and, therefore, the party moving to dismiss an appeal, or writ of error, for want of jurisdiction, must make it appear affirmatively, by motion for [165]*165that purpose, and brief supporting it, that none of the questions upon which the jurisdiction of this court depends, are involved in the cause sought to be dismissed.
Motion denied without prejudice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 Colo. 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lochbrunner-v-sherman-colo-1899.