Loblaw, Inc. v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Loblaw, Inc. v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.

442 N.E.2d 438, 57 N.Y.2d 872, 456 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3760

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 14, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by43 cases

This text of 442 N.E.2d 438 (Loblaw, Inc. v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Loblaw, Inc. v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp., 442 N.E.2d 438, 57 N.Y.2d 872, 456 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3760 (N.Y. 1982).

Pincite

Opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The record shows that a medical evaluation commissioned by Loblaw in April, 1966 determined that the employee had suffered a permanent partial disability. In addition an appraisal of the potential liability made at Loblaw’s request concluded that this could result in a very expensive claim in view of the comparative youth of the employee. A little more than a year later Loblaw’s agent informed it that a reserve of $31,500 was warranted and a subsequent medical evaluation of the employee confirmed the permanence of the injury and its extent. Nevertheless Loblaw did not notify the insurance company until June 20, 1972.

On the particular facts of this case it cannot be said that the Appellate Division erred when it held, as a matter of law, that Loblaw’s ongoing obligation to give notice of any claims arising under the policy was not complied with when it failed to give notice until five years after being informed that this claim might exceed $25,000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The record shows that a medical evaluation commissioned by Loblaw in April, 1966 determined that the employee had suffered a permanent partial disability. In addition an appraisal of the potential liability made at Loblaw’s request concluded that this could result in a very expensive claim in view of the comparative youth of the employee. A little more than a year later Loblaw’s agent informed it that a reserve of $31,500 was warranted and a subsequent medical evaluation of the employee confirmed the permanence of the injury and its extent. Nevertheless Loblaw did not notify the insurance company until June 20, 1972.

On the particular facts of this case it cannot be said that the Appellate Division erred when it held, as a matter of law, that Loblaw’s ongoing obligation to give notice of any claims arising under the policy was not complied with when it failed to give notice until five years after being informed that this claim might exceed $25,000.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

442 N.E.2d 438, 57 N.Y.2d 872, 456 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loblaw-inc-v-employers-liability-assurance-corp-ny-1982.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack