Lo Piccolo v. Knight of Rest Products Corp.
This text of 173 N.E.2d 51 (Lo Piccolo v. Knight of Rest Products Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. The jury’s verdict in favor of defendant, absent a motion by plaintiff for a directed verdict, [664]*664is upon this record conclusive against him; consequently, we need not here decide whether plaintiff had made out a prima facie case. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
173 N.E.2d 51, 9 N.Y.2d 662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lo-piccolo-v-knight-of-rest-products-corp-ny-1961.