Lo Dolce v. Regional Transit Service, Inc.

77 A.D.2d 697, 429 N.Y.S.2d 505, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12425
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 3, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 77 A.D.2d 697 (Lo Dolce v. Regional Transit Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lo Dolce v. Regional Transit Service, Inc., 77 A.D.2d 697, 429 N.Y.S.2d 505, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12425 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 24, 1979, as amended by decision filed September 25, 1979. The record establishes beyond any dispute that the claimant was discharged because of lost time due to an employment related accident. Such a dismissal explicitly violates section 120 of the Workers’ Compensation Law, which states, in pertinent part: "It shall be unlawful for any employer * * * to discharge or in any manner discriminate against an employee as to his employment because such employee has claimed or attempted to claim compensation from such employer”. The employer’s assertion before the board that proof as to its policy of discharging any employee because of excessive absenteeism should be permitted was properly rejected by the board as irrelevant to the treatment of this employee. In this case the discharge was solely because of the work-related accident and the underlying policy as to absenteeism expressly included such incidents. The employer has failed to establish any error of law on the part of the board and the decision appealed from is supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board against the employer. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bausman v. Interstate Brands Corp.
50 F. Supp. 2d 1028 (D. Kansas, 1999)
Yockey v. State
540 N.W.2d 418 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1995)
Ramirez v. IBP, Inc.
913 F. Supp. 1421 (D. Kansas, 1995)
Anderson v. Standard Register Co.
857 S.W.2d 555 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1993)
Wurst v. Nestle Foods Corp.
791 F. Supp. 123 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1991)
Coleman v. Safeway Stores, Inc.
752 P.2d 645 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1988)
Kern v. South Baltimore General Hospital
504 A.2d 1154 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1986)
Claim of Duncan v. New York State Developmental Center
470 N.E.2d 820 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Clifford v. Cactus Drilling Corp.
353 N.W.2d 469 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1984)
Claim of Kaye v. Brewster Central School District Board of Education
103 A.D.2d 870 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Galante v. Sandoz, Inc.
470 A.2d 45 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1983)
Claim of Solomon v. Cohn, Glickstein, Lurie, Ostrin & Lubell
97 A.D.2d 561 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Claim of Cormier v. Champlain Valley Physicians Hospital Medical Center
96 A.D.2d 634 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Claim of Duncan v. New York State Development Center
93 A.D.2d 242 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
In re the Claim of Griffin v. Eastman Kodak Co.
80 A.D.2d 689 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 A.D.2d 697, 429 N.Y.S.2d 505, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lo-dolce-v-regional-transit-service-inc-nyappdiv-1980.