Lo Bianco v. Cushing

182 A. 874, 119 N.J. Eq. 377, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 629
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 31, 1936·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the conclusion's reached by the vice-chancellor.

The decree below will be affirmed.

For affirmance —The Chief-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 12.

For reversal —None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lo Bianco v. Cushing, 182 A. 874, 119 N.J. Eq. 377, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 629 (N.J. 1936).

182 A. 874 (Lo Bianco v. Cushing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ferger v. Local 483
235 A.2d 482 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)
Derling v. Di Ubaldi
157 A.2d 864 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)
Cook v. John H. Mathis Co.
61 A.2d 585 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1948)
Minnesota Council of State Employees v. American Federation of State
19 N.W.2d 414 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1945)
Dragwa v. Federal Labor Union No. 23070
41 A.2d 32 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)
Chew v. Manhattan Laundries, Inc.
36 A.2d 205 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1944)
Dooley v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.
21 A.2d 334 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1941)
Central Bus Operators, Inc. v. Central Avenue Bus Owners Ass'n
11 A.2d 732 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1940)
Fleming v. Moving Picture Machine Operators
1 A.2d 850 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1938)