Lloyd v. Swansboro Land & Lumber Co.

83 S.E. 248, 167 N.C. 97, 1914 N.C. LEXIS 63
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 28, 1914·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Bbown, J.

At April Term, 1914, Whedbee, judge, made an order in this cause, allowing the plaintiffs to file amended complaint within thirty days, which order provided that if the plaintiffs fail either to file such amended complaint or to pay the cost as shown within thirty days from the adjournment of this term, then this action shall stand dismissed without further order.

The order could not be self-executing, and the condition is a nullity. The judge could not delegate to any one the power to enter up judgment if the amended complaint was not filed.

Alternative or conditional judgments are void. This left it open to the discretion of a succeeding judge to allow the amended pleadings to be filed. Strickland v. Cox, 102 N. C., 411; Woodcock v. Merriam, 122 N. C., 734; Church v. Church, 158 N. C., 564.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lloyd v. Swansboro Land & Lumber Co., 83 S.E. 248, 167 N.C. 97, 1914 N.C. LEXIS 63 (N.C. 1914).

83 S.E. 248 (Lloyd v. Swansboro Land & Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCraw v. Hamrick
363 S.E.2d 201 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1988)
Cassidy v. Cheek
303 S.E.2d 792 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1983)
Hagedorn v. . Hagedorn
185 S.E. 768 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
Luff v. . Levey
166 S.E. 922 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
Myers v. . Barnhardt
161 S.E. 715 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
Flinchum v. . Doughton
158 S.E. 486 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
Campbell v. City of Asheville
114 S.E. 825 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)
Church v. . Church
74 S.E. 14 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1912)