Flinchum v. Doughton

200 N.C. 770
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 13, 1931·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Stacy, 0. J.

The defendant’s exceptions have not been passed upon either by the clerk or the judge, and under the order of continuance substantial rights are required to be waived to obtain a hearing of any kind. This is contrary to the usual course and practice of the courts. Carter v. Rountree, 109 N. C., 29, 13 S. E., 716. Furthermore, the order in question is not self-executing, and its terms, are conditional. Church v. Church, 158 N. C., 564, 74 S. E., 14. “Alternative or conditional judgments are void.” Lloyd v. Lumber Co., 167 N. C., 97, 83 S. E., 248.

The order will be vacated, to the end that further proceedings may he had as the law directs and the rights of the parties require.

Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flinchum v. Doughton, 200 N.C. 770 (N.C. 1931).

200 N.C. 770 (Flinchum v. Doughton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCraw v. Hamrick
363 S.E.2d 201 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1988)
Cassidy v. Cheek
303 S.E.2d 792 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1983)
Hagedorn v. . Hagedorn
185 S.E. 768 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
Luff v. . Levey
166 S.E. 922 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
Myers v. . Barnhardt
161 S.E. 715 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)