Lloyd v. Fretz

84 A. 450, 235 Pa. 538, 1912 Pa. LEXIS 583
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 18, 1912·No. Appeal, No. 60·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

To what is said in the opinion of the learned president Judge of the Common Pleas, on which we affirm the judgment, it may be added that under the Act of June 4, 1879, P. L. 88, a power of appointment may be validly exercised without a recital thereof or direct reference thereto: Dillon v. Faloon, 158 Pa. 468.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lloyd v. Fretz, 84 A. 450, 235 Pa. 538, 1912 Pa. LEXIS 583 (Pa. 1912).

84 A. 450 (Lloyd v. Fretz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Mackie
49 Pa. D. & C. 459 (Susquehanna County Court of Common Pleas, 1943)
Moore v. Emery
18 A.2d 781 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1941)
Sinnott's Estate
165 A. 244 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Lafferty's Estate (No. 1)
167 A. 44 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Bosler's Estate
17 Pa. D. & C. 598 (Cumberland County Orphans' Court, 1932)