Lloyd v. Fretz
84 A. 450, 235 Pa. 538, 1912 Pa. LEXIS 583
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 18, 1912
DocketAppeal, No. 60
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases
This text of 84 A. 450 (Lloyd v. Fretz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lloyd v. Fretz, 84 A. 450, 235 Pa. 538, 1912 Pa. LEXIS 583 (Pa. 1912).
Opinion
To what is said in the opinion of the learned president Judge of the Common Pleas, on which we affirm the judgment, it may be added that under the Act of June 4, 1879, P. L. 88, a power of appointment may be validly exercised without a recital thereof or direct reference thereto: Dillon v. Faloon, 158 Pa. 468.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jones v. Mackie
49 Pa. D. & C. 459 (Susquehanna County Court of Common Pleas, 1943)
Moore v. Emery
18 A.2d 781 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1941)
Sinnott's Estate
165 A. 244 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Lafferty's Estate (No. 1)
167 A. 44 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Bosler's Estate
17 Pa. D. & C. 598 (Cumberland County Orphans' Court, 1932)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
84 A. 450, 235 Pa. 538, 1912 Pa. LEXIS 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-v-fretz-pa-1912.