Dillon v. Faloon
This text of 27 A. 1082 (Dillon v. Faloon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The facts of this case are substantially like those in Forsythe v. Forsythe, 108 Pa. 129, and furnish a basis for a like judgment. There, as here, a devise was made to a widow for life with an absolute power of testamentary disposition which was exercised; and it was held that the title made by the widow was in fee. The power of testamentary disposition necessarily excluded the life estate given the widow and made her will inoperative unless as an execution of it. Even a general devise of real estate raises a presumption of intention to execute the power, and no recital of the power is necessary: Act June 4, 1879, sec. 3, P. L. 88. There was, therefore, no error in entering judgment, on the case stated, in favor of the plaintiff.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 A. 1082, 158 Pa. 468, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dillon-v-faloon-pa-1893.