Lloyd Clifford Smith v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 10, 2015
DocketA15I0159
StatusPublished

This text of Lloyd Clifford Smith v. State (Lloyd Clifford Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lloyd Clifford Smith v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ April 10, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15I0159. LLOYD CLIFFORD SMITH v. THE STATE.

Houston County State Court Judge Susan E. McNally entered an order denying

Lloyd Clifford Smith’s motion in limine and motion to suppress. Smith obtained a

certificate of immediate review signed by a different judge and filed this application

for interlocutory appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), a party may apply for interlocutory appellate review

“[w]here the trial judge in rendering an order, decision, or judgment, not otherwise

subject to direct appeal . . . certifies within ten days of entry thereof that the order,

decision, or judgment is of such importance to the case that immediate review should

be had.” (Emphasis supplied.) The plain language of the statute requires that the

same judge who enters the order in question must certify it for immediate review.1

1 This Court has recognized a limited exception to this rule where evidence shows that the trial judge was unavailable to execute the certificate. See Freemon v. Dubroca, 177 Ga. App. 745 (1) (341 SE2d 276) (1986); Tingle v. Harvill, 125 Ga. App. 312, 317-318 (2) (187 SE2d 536) (1972); see also Thorpe v. Russell, 274 Ga. 781, 781-782 (559 SE2d 432) (2002). Smith, however, has made no showing that Judge McNally was unavailable. See Mauer v. Parker Fibernet, LLC, 306 Ga. App. 160, 162 (701 SE2d 599) (2010).

Because the certificate of immediate review submitted by Smith is invalid, it

does not confer jurisdiction upon this Court. Accordingly, the application for

interlocutory appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 04/10/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Freemon v. Dubroca
341 S.E.2d 276 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Tingle v. Harvill
187 S.E.2d 536 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Mauer v. Parker Fibernet, LLC
701 S.E.2d 599 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2010)
Thorpe v. Russell
559 S.E.2d 432 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lloyd Clifford Smith v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-clifford-smith-v-state-gactapp-2015.