Llano v. DeKalb County

331 S.E.2d 36, 174 Ga. App. 693, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 1932
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 18, 1985
Docket70205
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 331 S.E.2d 36 (Llano v. DeKalb County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Llano v. DeKalb County, 331 S.E.2d 36, 174 Ga. App. 693, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 1932 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

Banke, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of the appellee-condemnor in a condemnation case. Held:

1. The appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal based on a delay in filing, the transcript is denied. Failure of the appellant to cause the transcript to be filed in accordance with the time limitations set forth in OCGA § 5-6-42 is not itself a ground for dismissal of the appeal, absent a judicial determination that the resulting delay was both unreasonable and inexcusable. See OCGA § 5-6-58; Young v. Jones, 147 Ga. App. 65 (1) (248 SE2d 49) (1978).

2. The appellant’s first enumeration of error concerns the trial court’s alleged refusal to admit a copy of a sublease agreement between himself and Amoco Oil Company pertaining to the property in question. However, we are not referred to the location in the transcript where such evidence was offered, nor are we cited to any ruling [694]*694of the trial court excluding it. In the absence of such references to the transcript, this enumeration of error will not be considered. See Rule 15 (c) (3) of this court.

Decided April 18, 1985 S. Lee Storesund, for appellant. George P. Dillard, for appellee.

3. The trial court did not err in charging the jury that the appellant had a duty to take reasonable steps to minimize the damage resulting from the loss of his business, the appellee having introduced at least some evidence to indicate that relocation options were available to the appellant. See Garber v. Housing Auth. of Atlanta, 123 Ga. App. 29 (3), 31-32 (179 SE2d 300) (1970); Continental Corp. v. Dept. of Transp., 172 Ga. App. 766 (1) (324 SE2d 588) (1984).

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, P. J., and Benham, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. Hardy Chevrolet-Pontiac-Buick, Inc.
417 S.E.2d 358 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
State v. Jackson
372 S.E.2d 823 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
331 S.E.2d 36, 174 Ga. App. 693, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 1932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/llano-v-dekalb-county-gactapp-1985.