Livingston v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co.

Superior Court of New York

Livingston v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co.

18 N.Y.S. 204

CourtThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

DecidedFebruary 15, 1892

StatusPublished

This text of 18 N.Y.S. 204 (Livingston v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Livingston v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co., 18 N.Y.S. 204 (superctny 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Gildersleeve, J.

The judgment permits the defendants to pay to plaintiffs the sum of $4,000, with interest from the date of the report, in avoidance of the injunction restraining defendants from maintaining and operating their elevated railroad in front of premises Nos. 72 and 74 West Broadway, in the city of New York; and it awards to plaintiffs the sum of $269.33 as damages, together with costs and allowance. The property involved in this case adjoins the premises which are the subject-matter of the case of Julia Livingston against These Defendants, affirmed at this general term, 18 N. Y. Supp. 203, and the two cases rest upon the same evidence, and present precisely the same questions. For the reasons stated in the opinion in the said case of Julia Livingston against These Defendants, the judgment herein is affirmed, with costs.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gildersleeve, J.

The judgment permits the defendants to pay to plaintiffs the sum of $4,000, with interest from the date of the report, in avoidance of the injunction restraining defendants from maintaining and operating their elevated railroad in front of premises Nos. 72 and 74 West Broadway, in the city of New York; and it awards to plaintiffs the sum of $269.33 as damages, together with costs and allowance. The property involved in this case adjoins the premises which are the subject-matter of the case of Julia Livingston against These Defendants, affirmed at this general term, 18 N. Y. Supp. 203, and the two cases rest upon the same evidence, and present precisely the same questions. For the reasons stated in the opinion in the said case of Julia Livingston against These Defendants, the judgment herein is affirmed, with costs.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 N.Y.S. 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/livingston-v-metropolitan-el-ry-co-superctny-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack