Livingston v. Livingston

65 A.D. 242, 72 N.Y.S. 487
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 1, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 65 A.D. 242 (Livingston v. Livingston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Livingston v. Livingston, 65 A.D. 242, 72 N.Y.S. 487 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Opinion

Laughlin, J.:

It is sought by this appeal to have the court pass upon the constitutionality of the amendment to section 1759 of the Code of Civil Procedure, by which the Legislature has authorized the courts upon notice and proof, to vary or modify the direction contained in a final judgment of divorce theretofore rendered with respect to the payment required to be made by the husband for the support and maintenance of his wife and children. The order is interlocutory and we decline to pass upon this constitutional question at the present time. (People ex rel. Trowbridge v. McNamara, 18 App. Div. 17; People ex rel. Iselin v. Tilford, 23 id. 625.) It is not necessarily involved in the case. The proof may satisfy the court that the decree should not be modified even if the power to modify [244]*244exists. The reference should be permitted to proceed, and the motion should be heard upon the merits; then, if the constitutional question necessarily arises, it may with propriety be authoritatively decided.

The appeal should be dismissed, but without costs.

Van Brunt, P. J., O’Brien and Ingraham, JJ., concurred.

Appeal dismissed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Livingston v. Livingston
74 N.Y.S. 1135 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 A.D. 242, 72 N.Y.S. 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/livingston-v-livingston-nyappdiv-1901.