Litvin v. State

639 So. 2d 71, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4694, 1994 WL 189596
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 18, 1994·No. No. 93-3443·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant rehearing, withdraw our opinion of December 22, 1993, and substitute the following opinion:

We affirm the trial court order denying post-conviction relief in all respects except with regard to the computation of gain time concerning which the state acknowledges error. Upon sentencing following a violation of probation, Appellant was entitled to a credit [72]*72for time served, including earned gain time. The Appellant was initially incarcerated prior to October 1, 1989. See Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993); Thomas v. State, 627 So.2d 1295 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Jean v. State, 627 So.2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Springer v. State, 626 So.2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

The record reflects that Appellant is entitled to a credit of four years served in prison .plus 312 days in jail.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings.

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Litvin v. State, 639 So. 2d 71, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4694, 1994 WL 189596 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

639 So. 2d 71 (Litvin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bayshore v. State
651 So. 2d 248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)