Litvin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Litvin v. State

639 So. 2d 71, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4694, 1994 WL 189596

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 18, 1994

DocketNo. 93-3443

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 639 So. 2d 71 (Litvin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Litvin v. State, 639 So. 2d 71, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4694, 1994 WL 189596 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant rehearing, withdraw our opinion of December 22, 1993, and substitute the following opinion:

We affirm the trial court order denying post-conviction relief in all respects except with regard to the computation of gain time concerning which the state acknowledges error. Upon sentencing following a violation of probation, Appellant was entitled to a credit [72]*72for time served, including earned gain time. The Appellant was initially incarcerated prior to October 1, 1989. See Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993); Thomas v. State, 627 So.2d 1295 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Jean v. State, 627 So.2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Springer v. State, 626 So.2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

The record reflects that Appellant is entitled to a credit of four years served in prison .plus 312 days in jail.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings.

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We grant rehearing, withdraw our opinion of December 22, 1993, and substitute the following opinion:

We affirm the trial court order denying post-conviction relief in all respects except with regard to the computation of gain time concerning which the state acknowledges error. Upon sentencing following a violation of probation, Appellant was entitled to a credit [72]*72for time served, including earned gain time. The Appellant was initially incarcerated prior to October 1, 1989. See Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993); Thomas v. State, 627 So.2d 1295 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Jean v. State, 627 So.2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Springer v. State, 626 So.2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

The record reflects that Appellant is entitled to a credit of four years served in prison .plus 312 days in jail.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings.

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

639 So. 2d 71, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4694, 1994 WL 189596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/litvin-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack