Springer v. State
This text of 616 So. 2d 1105 (Springer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We find no merit in appellant's contention that his conviction should be reversed. Appellant has cited no cases in support of his other contention that he is entitled to credit for time served against the incarceration imposed as a condition of probation, but several cases decided by this court support this argument. E.g., Greer v. State, 605 So.2d 178 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) and cases cited therein. We conclude appellant is entitled to the credit claimed.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED and REMANDED FOR CORRECTION.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
616 So. 2d 1105, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3844, 1993 WL 104641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/springer-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.