Springer v. State
616 So. 2d 1105, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3844, 1993 WL 104641
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 9, 1993·No. No. 91-1967·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinions
We find no merit in appellant's contention that his conviction should be reversed. Appellant has cited no cases in support of his other contention that he is entitled to credit for time served against the incarceration imposed as a condition of probation, but several cases decided by this court support this argument. E.g., Greer v. State, 605 So.2d 178 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) and cases cited therein. We conclude appellant is entitled to the credit claimed.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED and REMANDED FOR CORRECTION.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Springer v. State, 616 So. 2d 1105, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3844, 1993 WL 104641 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
616 So. 2d 1105 (Springer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mathis v. State
649 So. 2d 279 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
McKay v. State
618 So. 2d 792 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)