Springer v. State

616 So. 2d 1105, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3844, 1993 WL 104641
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 9, 1993
DocketNo. 91-1967
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 616 So. 2d 1105 (Springer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Springer v. State, 616 So. 2d 1105, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3844, 1993 WL 104641 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in appellant's contention that his conviction should be reversed. Appellant has cited no cases in support of his other contention that he is entitled to credit for time served against the incarceration imposed as a condition of probation, but several cases decided by this court support this argument. E.g., Greer v. State, 605 So.2d 178 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) and cases cited therein. We conclude appellant is entitled to the credit claimed.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED and REMANDED FOR CORRECTION.

DAUKSCH and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur. HARRIS, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mathis v. State
649 So. 2d 279 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
McKay v. State
618 So. 2d 792 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
616 So. 2d 1105, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3844, 1993 WL 104641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/springer-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.