Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., Defendant-Cross

145 F.3d 1472, 47 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1106, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 13028, 1998 WL 321693
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided June 18, 1998·No. 95-1242, 95-1311·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinions

ORDER

A combined petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc having been filed by the Appellant, and a response therto having been invited by the court and filed by the Cross Appellant, and the petition for rehearing having been referred to the panel that heard the appeal and thereafter the suggestion for rehearing in banc and response having been referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service, and a poll whether to rehear the appeal in banc having been requested, taken, and failed, it is

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be, and the same hereby is, DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that the suggestion for rehearing in bane be, and the same hereby is, DECLINED.

Circuit Judges Plager, Clevenger, and Ga-jarsa dissent in separate opinions.

Circuit Judge Newman has filed a separate opinion with views on the suggestion for rehearing in banc.

The mandate of the court will issue on June 25,1998.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., Defendant-Cross, 145 F.3d 1472, 47 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1106, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 13028, 1998 WL 321693 (Fed. Cir. 1998).

145 F.3d 1472 (Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., Defendant-Cross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related